Horror often isn't as highly regarded as other film genres, even though
it strongly reflects the values of a culture by revealing what scares society
most. The films are filled with symbolism, especially regarding the feminine
gender, which is frequently depicted in a negative or demeaning light. Being a
feminist, this instantly caught my attention. True, there are films that
include a heroine, but the majority also invoke the cliché stereotype of the
hyper-sexualized, blonde "damsel in distress" who is the first one
killed by a blood-thirsty psychopath due to some foolish mistake. In an attempt
to dive further into the women's studies component of horror movies and see how
women are represented in such films, I decided to watch three movies that are
labeled as classics by the horror community: Psycho (1960), A
Nightmare on Elm Street (1984), and Carrie (1976).
Psycho is one of the jewels in
renowned film director Alfred Hitchcock's crown. It ushered in the era of the
"slasher" film and set new levels of toleration for violence and
sexuality in American movies. Whether or not people have seen the movie, they
recognize the iconic shower scene in which Marion (Janet Leigh) is stabbed by
an unknown killer. The film centers around Marion Crane, a secretary whose
divorced lover cannot marry her due to alimony payments he owes his ex wife,
and Norman Bates, a timid, disturbed man who runs the Bates Motel and is under
the control of his mother. Unhappy and unfulfilled in her relationship, Marion
steals $40,000 in hopes of starting a better life.
At the beginning of the film, the audience sees that Marion is trapped
as a subordinate in her relationship with Sam. In one of the first shots,
Marion is lying on a bed with Sam situated over her in a conventional
male-dominated arrangement. Though Marion is dressed only in her white
undergarments, she plays the traditional pure female by telling Sam to cease
his sexual advances for the moment and listen to her as she turns the topic of
their conversation to marriage, which Sam expresses aversion to, illustrating
the stereotypical female desire to begin a family life. Marion, in this scene,
is portrayed as virtuous, playful, yet protective of her modesty. The perfect,
compliant woman. This depicts the way the horror films tend to stick to
standard gender roles, with women being shown as the weaker of the sexes. Later
on, though, Marion adopts a more masculine demeanor when she steals the
$40,000, something that a demure lady wouldn't do. Her sexuality is played up
as well as she is again shown undressed, but in a black bra this time. The
message this seems to send is that when women break from their feminine gender
roles and become too assertive, like a man, they become dangerous and
untrustworthy. The images of Marion in her underwear also enforce the notion
that women are sexual objects to be sought after. When Marion arrives at the
Bates Motel, Norman Bates spies on her as she undresses, but is shy around her
because of his overbearing mother. In one of their conversations during Marion's
stay at the motel, Norman likens Marion to a bird, which brings the two to
Norman's fascination with taxidermy. He comments that he likes the look of
stuffed birds because birds possess a passive nature, but he hates when wild
beasts are stuffed. This implies that women are supposed to be passive and
submissive, while men are meant to, like wild beasts, be dominant and
aggressive. Norman portrays the male desire for dominance in his final act
towards Marion. He stabs her while she is in the shower; the ultimate assertion
of power and a symbolic version of rape. Her nudity represents her
powerlessness and emphasizes her femininity, reinforcing the idea that women
are meant to be controlled. Hitchcock makes this event to be Marion's
punishment for challenging her traditional feminine identity.

In A Nightmare on
Elm Street, the audience gets to see a variety of opposing female roles,
mainly, the virginal versus the sexual. Due to the progress of the feminist
movement, we also are able to witness a strong woman in a leading role, in the
form of a heroine who defeats the male villain using only her own strength and
intelligence. In this film, a deceased child molester, Freddy Kreuger, who has
the ability to invade peoples' dreams and cause the dreamer actual physical
harm while within their mind, takes it upon himself to terrorize and murder the
teenage children of the parents who burned him alive. While the main character,
Nancy (Heather Langenkamp), is strong, the other female teens are killed off,
though. The reason? They are sexually promiscuous. While Nancy remains a virgin
throughout the entire film, her friends do not. Here we encounter the classic
stock character of the pretty, sexually active girl who gets killed first. It
seems as if the girls are being punished for their sexual involvement, which
leads to the message that sex means death in horror movies. In the scene where
Tina is shown having sex with her boyfriend, Tina later falls asleep and is
ripped open by Freddy. Though the film does feature a strong female lead,
the argument can be made that Nancy only is able to conquer the villain due to
adopting stereotypically male traits, such as anger, aggressiveness, and
independence. These characteristics set her apart from the other girls in the
movie. Being more masculine, she is able to be accepted by the audience as a
plausible hero. Her lack of sexual urges also helps the audience to ignore her
femininity. However, none of this occurs before Nancy is sexually exploited.
When Nancy falls asleep while taking a bath, Freddy's clawed hand rises up out
of the water between her spread legs. She is vulnerable and powerless, similar
to a traditional picture of a woman, while Freddy expresses his wish to
dominate and take advantage of her. Nancy escapes, but we witness her at an
emotionally weak point where the message is again sent to the viewer that women
are fragile and objects of desire. Nancy is also violated when she attempts to
make a phone call for help and the end of the telephone transforms into
Freddy's mouth, allowing Freddy to lick her. After taking on her masculine
persona, though, Nancy saves herself from the killer. Unfortunately, all is not
well at the end of the movie. Our heroine ends up being killed anyway,
asserting that the male gender will always be dominant.
Though the leading ladies of the three films are
each unique, one implication follows them: that women are sexual objects who,
if given power, should be punished. Through the horror genre, a viewer can
witness the fears and stereotypes that society has for females. By killing off
women in horror movies who express sexual dominance or uncharacteristic
strength, it might be implied that men fear female sexuality. More modern
films, though, have been more influenced by the feminist movement and are
beginning to depict characters who can triumph by relying on "girl
power". Since women have more influence in the world today, it is easier
for filmmakers to show them, not as damsels in distress, but as heroes and even
monsters, but since society is very much patriarchal and, sometimes,
misogynistic, there will always be movies that feature scorn for or
exploitation of women.
connecting article: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2007/apr/06/2

I've seen all three of these movies and really like them all, especially Carrie. I recently did the same version of Psycho for my MYST post and of course overall thought it was a really good film with some exceptions like the scene between the private investigator and "mother" on the stairs. Didn't really care for that too much. Carrie has to be one of my favorite horror movies to watch over and over again because I think it just never gets old. They also made a sequal to it that wasn't that bad because it wasn't just a complete repeat of the same movie which was nice.
ReplyDeleteHey Gianna--Excellent, excellent, excellent work here. Great genre criticism. As your links suggest, the horror genre's misogyny is nothing new, but your detailed analysis really shows specifics about how the genre perpetuates cliches about women. It'd be interesting to further your analysis by examining horror films released in the past year or two and how THEY portray women. Are they truly as progressive as we'd think? Anyway, great work with this--this would even work well in my Rhetoric class as cultural criticism. Keep up the good work--looking forward to your next post.
ReplyDelete